Where are the inns that put wagyu at the center of dinner? HotelBank Editorial Team analyzed guest reviews and extracted the top 100 properties with the most positive mentions of wagyu and branded beef. Mie had 19, Yamagata 12 and Hyogo 11 — more than 40% of the list sits in the three prefectures that produce Matsusaka beef, Yonezawa beef and Kobe beef (Tajima beef). At the municipal level, Yonezawa City in Yamagata alone accounts for 9. This article walks through the distribution by prefecture and its link to branded beef, the 20 properties with the highest mention rates, autumn and winter estimated settled ADR in the producing municipalities, and the dinner formats that guests mention alongside wagyu, then sets out implications for operators designing winter dinner plans.
• ADR (average daily rate) = estimated settled rate (tax-excluded equivalent), calculated by applying segment-specific adjustment factors to the lowest-plan level each property publishes on OTAs (2 guests per room, per-room rate, tax included). Checked against property-level results disclosed by listed hotel REITs (91 properties, most recent 3 months), the median error is about 7%. These are estimates and differ from each property’s actual settled prices and accounting figures.
• Area-level ADR (prefecture / municipality) is the median of the estimated settled rates of the properties covered (the level of a typical property in the area).
• Where listed prices are mentioned, they are per-room rates for 2 guests per room (tax included).
• OCC (occupancy) = rooms sold as a share of total rooms in the area (estimate based on OTA sales inventory).
• Source: MetroEngines Research (continuous tracking of OTA public rates for about 168,000 properties in Japan, of which about 27,000 are confirmed operating)
• Wagyu mentions = the number of guest reviews that refer positively to wagyu, branded beef, Kuroge Wagyu or local beef brands at dinner (including shabu-shabu and teppanyaki).
• Mention rate = mentions ÷ the property’s total reviews. It measures how often the topic comes up, not a rating score (★).
• Coverage: properties with at least 20 reviews and at least 10 wagyu mentions in the last 24 months. The top 100 were selected in descending order of mentions.
• Source: HotelBank Editorial Team research (NLP analysis of guest reviews).
- — Mie 19, Yamagata 12, Hyogo 11 More than 40% of the top 100 properties with the most positive wagyu reviews are in the three prefectures of Matsusaka, Yonezawa and Kobe (Tajima) beef. Yonezawa City alone has 9.
- — 2.5% Of 92,658 reviews for the top 100 properties, 2,315 mention wagyu positively (last 24 months). The median property-level mention rate is 2.6%, and 9 properties exceed 10%.
- — 3.8% at ≤30 rooms vs 1.4% at 121+ rooms The smaller the property, the higher the mention rate; half of the top 20 by mention rate are small ryokan in the Okitama region of Yamagata.
- — ¥39,100 Winter (Dec 2025–Feb 2026) estimated settled ADR for ryokan in Arima Onsen (Kita Ward, Kobe). That is +24.6% vs autumn; Shima City is +41.0%, and only Nasu Town is down (-3.6%).
- — 41st–46th of 47 prefectures On the half-board (dinner and breakfast) premium for October 2026 stays (hotel segment), Tottori, Tochigi, Oita and Yamagata fall below the national median of ¥8,200. Hyogo ranks 2nd and Mie 6th.
The top 100 at a glance — 2,315 wagyu mentions out of 92,658 reviews
First, the size of the base. The top 100 properties received 92,658 reviews in the last 24 months, of which 2,315 — 2.5% of the total — referred positively to wagyu. The median property-level mention rate was 2.6%; 17 properties exceeded 5% and 9 exceeded 10%. Dinner is often discussed alongside the hot springs and service, and even at a frequency of 2–3 in 100 reviews, wagyu is clearly a dish that stays in guests’ memories.
By segment, ryokan account for 69 properties, or about 70%, followed by resort hotels (13) and business hotels and city hotels (6 each). The median room count is 48.5, so mid-sized ryokan of around 50 rooms form the core. Hotels make up 25 properties in total, earning praise from a different audience than ryokan with dinner buffets that feature wagyu steak or yakiniku.
Distribution by prefecture — 42 in Mie, Yamagata and Hyogo, overlapping with branded-beef regions
By prefecture, Mie (19), Yamagata (12) and Hyogo (11) lead, followed by Oita and Tochigi (7 each) and Tottori (6). All of the top six prefectures have a signature beef brand, and the wagyu praise left in reviews clusters in branded-beef producing regions. Total mentions tell the same story: Mie 414, Hyogo 364 and Yamagata 363, well ahead of the rest.
Source: HotelBank Editorial Team research (NLP analysis of guest reviews, last 24 months)
That said, where an inn is located and where the beef is raised do not always coincide. Of Mie’s 19 properties, 8 are in Toba and 5 in Ise — tourist inns in Ise-Shima making Matsusaka beef the centerpiece of dinner. The production area of “Tokusan Matsusaka Ushi”, registered as a Geographical Indication (GI) by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, covers 22 former municipalities including Matsusaka, Tsu and Ise, but not Toba or Shima. Destinations known for seafood are combining the prefecture’s branded beef with it to raise the standing of their dinners.
Yamagata, by contrast, has 11 of its 12 properties in the Okitama region, the GI production area for Yonezawa beef (Yonezawa 9, Nanyo 2), so the producing area and the serving area almost coincide. In Hyogo, 8 of 11 are in Arima Onsen in Kita Ward, Kobe, many of them onsen ryokan serving Kobe beef or Tajima beef in kaiseki courses or as shabu-shabu.
| Prefecture / branded beef (example) | Top 100 | Main municipalities (properties) |
|---|---|---|
| Mie / Matsusaka beef | 19 | Toba 8, Ise 5, Tsu 2, Shima 1, Matsusaka 1, others |
| Yamagata / Yonezawa beef | 12 | Yonezawa 9, Nanyo 2, Yamagata City 1 |
| Hyogo / Kobe beef, Tajima beef | 11 | Kobe Kita Ward (Arima Onsen) 8, Suma Ward 1, Chuo Ward 1, Kato 1 |
| Oita / Oita Wagyu | 7 | Beppu 3, Yufu 3, Hiji 1 |
| Tochigi / Tochigi Wagyu | 7 | Nasu 3, Nasushiobara 1, Otawara 1, Nikko 1, Sakura 1 |
| Tottori / Tottori Wagyu | 6 | Yurihama 2, Misasa 2, Yonago 2 |
Source: HotelBank Editorial Team research (NLP analysis of guest reviews, last 24 months)
Top 20 by mention rate — small inns in Yonezawa dominate
Re-ranking by mention rate instead of mention count changes the lineup considerably. Ten of the top 20 are in Yamagata’s Okitama region; at Toki no Yado Sumire (時の宿 すみれ, 10 rooms) in Yonezawa, 32.4% of reviews mentioned wagyu. Kajikaso (河鹿荘), also in Yonezawa, ranks high on both count and rate with 152 mentions and a 22.7% mention rate. Arima Gyoen (有馬御苑) in Hyogo has 166 mentions — the most of all 100 — and a high 14.0% rate. Biratori Onsen Yukara (びらとり温泉 美味い宿 ゆから, 15 rooms) in Biratori, Hokkaido, draws 11.1% with local Biratori Wagyu — an example showing that even without a nationally known brand, an inn that makes local beef its signature can become one guests talk about in reviews.
| Rank | Property | Location | Mentions | Mention rate | Type | Rooms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toki no Yado Sumire (時の宿 すみれ) | Yamagata, Yonezawa | 24 | 32.4% | Ryokan | 10 |
| 2 | Pension Omochabako (ペンション おもちゃばこ) | Yamagata, Yonezawa | 14 | 24.1% | Pension | 10 |
| 3 | Kajikaso (河鹿荘) | Yamagata, Yonezawa | 152 | 22.7% | Ryokan | 31 |
| 4 | Ogiya Ryokan (扇屋旅館) | Yamagata, Yonezawa | 14 | 15.6% | Ryokan | 7 |
| 5 | Onogawa Onsen Takasagoya (小野川温泉 たかさごや) | Yamagata, Yonezawa | 15 | 14.2% | Ryokan | 10 |
| 6 | Arima Gyoen (有馬御苑) | Hyogo, Kobe Kita Ward | 166 | 14.0% | Ryokan | 65 |
| 7 | Tansen Hotel (丹泉ホテル) | Yamagata, Nanyo | 23 | 11.2% | Ryokan | 32 |
| 8 | Shirabu Onsen Higashiya (白布温泉 東屋) | Yamagata, Yonezawa | 24 | 11.1% | Ryokan | 18 |
| 9 | Biratori Onsen Yukara (びらとり温泉 美味い宿 ゆから) | Hokkaido, Biratori | 40 | 11.1% | Ryokan | 15 |
| 10 | Ryokan Daimonjiya (旅館 大文字屋) | Yamagata, Nanyo | 21 | 9.4% | Ryokan | 28 |
| 11 | Yutaki no Yado Nishiya (湯滝の宿 西屋) | Yamagata, Yonezawa | 14 | 9.2% | Ryokan | 16 |
| 12 | Akari no Yado Togetsu (灯りの宿 燈月) | Oita, Beppu | 104 | 9.1% | Ryokan | 41 |
| 13 | Azumaso (吾妻荘) | Yamagata, Yonezawa | 20 | 9.0% | Ryokan | 20 |
| 14 | Yumoto Sakakibarakan (湯元榊原舘) | Mie, Tsu | 19 | 5.5% | Ryokan | 80 |
| 15 | Nozawa Onsen Kawaichiya Ryokan (野沢温泉 河一屋旅館) | Nagano, Nozawaonsen Village | 12 | 5.4% | Ryokan | 20 |
| 16 | Kamihoroso (カミホロ荘) | Hokkaido, Kamifurano | 13 | 5.2% | Ryokan | 23 |
| 17 | TAKEYA HONKAN | Kyoto, Kamigyo Ward | 13 | 5.1% | Machiya | 1 |
| 18 | Hamachiyokan (海辺の旅館 浜千代館) | Mie, Ise | 13 | 5.0% | Ryokan | 21 |
| 19 | Kappo Ryokan Kannawa Bettei (割烹旅館 かんな和別邸) | Oita, Beppu | 13 | 4.9% | Ryokan | 6 |
| 20 | Saio no Miya (伊勢に佇む 王朝浪漫の夢見宿 斎王の宮) | Mie, Ise | 15 | 4.9% | Business hotel | 28 |
* The top 100 properties extracted by positive wagyu mentions (20+ reviews, 10+ mentions), sorted by mention rate. Mention rate measures how often the topic comes up; it does not indicate a property’s rating or quality.
Source: HotelBank Editorial Team research (NLP analysis of guest reviews, last 24 months)
Most of the properties in the table have fewer than 30 rooms. Aggregating mention rates by room-count band gives 3.8% for the 30 properties with 30 rooms or fewer, 3.3% for the 31 with 31–60 rooms, 2.3% for the 22 with 61–120 rooms and 1.4% for the 17 with 121 rooms or more: the smaller the property, the more likely wagyu is to be the topic of conversation. Small inns can narrow their dinner menus more easily and make wagyu stand out as the star dish, which is likely behind this gap.
Source: HotelBank Editorial Team research (NLP analysis of guest reviews, last 24 months)
Reviews often describe exactly how the beef was served. Comments included “the Kobe beef shabu-shabu was very delicious…” at Arima Gyoen, “the Yonezawa beef and local sake tasting set we had at dinner…” at Kajikaso, “the Yonezawa beef kaiseki was wonderful…” at Toki no Yado Sumire, and “all-you-can-eat Oita Wagyu steak…” at Akari no Yado Togetsu in Beppu (all partial quotes from reviews mentioning wagyu in the last 24 months). The fact that guests remember the brand name together with the dish is a useful reference when considering the effect of putting the producing region’s name in plan names.
Dinners talked about with wagyu — seafood pairings exceed 20%
So in what kind of dinner is wagyu being praised? Of the 2,315 reviews mentioning wagyu at the top 100 properties, at least 495 (21.4%) also mentioned seafood or sashimi. Dinner buffets followed with 264 (11.4%), crab 145 (6.3%), kaiseki 115 (5.0%) and steak/teppanyaki 77 (3.3%). Rather than wagyu standing on its own, many guests remember a “surf and turf” dinner offering both seafood and meat.
* Number of reviews in which wagyu and each element were mentioned together. Because each combination is aggregated from the properties with the most co-mentions, counts should be treated as lower bounds.
Source: HotelBank Editorial Team research (NLP analysis of guest reviews, last 24 months)
This pattern is especially clear in Ise-Shima, Mie. At Kamenoi Hotel Toba (亀の井ホテル 鳥羽) in Toba, comments such as “the Matsusaka beef shabu-shabu was absolutely delicious…” and “we enjoyed Matsusaka beef and snow crab…” sit side by side, positioning Matsusaka beef as one dinner highlight alongside seafood. Meanwhile, inns in Yonezawa and Arima Onsen serve it as shabu-shabu or within kaiseki courses, and ryokan in Beppu serve it as steak at the buffet — the same wagyu is presented differently by region. Steak co-mentions are low at 3.3%, likely because when wagyu is the star of the plate, guests tend to write the brand — “Yonezawa beef”, “Matsusaka beef” — rather than “steak”.
Autumn and winter rates in producing municipalities — Arima Onsen ¥39k in winter, Shima +41% vs autumn
For the municipalities where wagyu-led inns cluster, we compared ryokan estimated settled ADR in autumn (September–October 2025) and winter (December 2025–February 2026). All values are for closed months. The highest winter rate is in Kita Ward, Kobe (Arima Onsen) at ¥39,100, followed by Yufu at ¥26,400, Shima at ¥24,700 and Toba at ¥23,100. Growth from autumn was +41.0% in Shima, +24.6% in Arima Onsen, +22.9% in Yonezawa and +22.3% in Misasa — in most producing areas, rates rose in winter. The layered rate structure across Hyogo, including Arima Onsen, is analyzed in detail in Hyogo’s Hotel Market in 5 Layers 2026.
| Municipality | Branded beef (prefecture) | Autumn Sep–Oct | Winter Dec–Feb | vs autumn | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mie, Toba | Matsusaka beef / Ise-Shima | ¥20,200 | ¥23,100 | +14.2% | N=66〜72 |
| Mie, Shima | Matsusaka beef / Ise-Shima | ¥17,600 | ¥24,700 | +41.0% | N=31〜33 |
| Mie, Ise | Matsusaka beef / Ise-Shima | ¥13,900 | ¥16,800 | +20.8% | N=26〜27 |
| Yamagata, Yonezawa | Yonezawa beef | ¥13,500 | ¥16,600 | +22.9% | N=15〜18 |
| Yamagata, Nanyo | Yonezawa beef | ¥11,600 | ¥15,800〜¥24,400 | +83.8% | N=11〜13 |
| Hyogo, Kobe Kita Ward (Arima Onsen) | Kobe beef / Tajima beef (Arima Onsen) | ¥31,400 | ¥39,100 | +24.6% | N=32〜33 |
| Oita, Beppu | Oita Wagyu | ¥16,100 | ¥19,100 | +18.5% | N=75〜81 |
| Oita, Yufu | Oita Wagyu | ¥23,200 | ¥26,400 | +13.8% | N=120〜124 |
| Tochigi, Nasu | Tochigi Wagyu | ¥21,000 | ¥20,200 | -3.6% | N=28〜29 |
| Tottori, Misasa | Tottori Wagyu | ¥17,000 | ¥20,800 | +22.3% | N=17〜18 |
| Tottori, Yurihama | Tottori Wagyu | ¥8,700 | ¥8,600〜¥13,400 | +19.0% | N=8 |
* Ryokan estimated settled ADR (median of covered properties in each municipality). Autumn and winter are simple averages of monthly values. For Nanyo and Yurihama, with fewer than 15 covered properties, winter is shown as the monthly min–max range (the change vs autumn uses the 3-month average).
Source: Compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team from MetroEngines Research
Source: Compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team from MetroEngines Research
That said, the winter rise cannot be explained by wagyu alone. December–February includes year-end and New Year demand, and it overlaps with the winter seafood season in Ise-Shima and the crab season in Tottori. What the data does show is that winter is a period when rates are easier to raise even in areas with many wagyu-serving inns, and branded-beef dinners can be one of the ingredients supporting that uplift. Nasu, at ¥21,000 in autumn and ¥20,200 in winter, is roughly flat — an area where rates are stable regardless of season.
Towns with few covered properties are best read as ranges. Nanyo (N=11–13) ranged from ¥15,800 to ¥24,400 over the three winter months and Yurihama (N=8) from ¥8,600 to ¥13,400; month-to-month swings are large, and price moves at one or two properties can shift the median.
Implications for operators — room to grow branded-beef pricing, seen in half-board premiums
Finally, we look at dinner-plan price gaps at the prefecture level. Among properties that sell both “breakfast included” and “half board” plans in the same hotel, the half-board premium (listed-price basis, October 2026 stays) was ¥13,400 (+38.8%, N=71 properties) in Hyogo and ¥10,900 (+41.8%, N=46) in Mie, both above the median of all 47 prefectures of ¥8,200 (+29.8%). Tottori was ¥6,600 (N=19), Tochigi ¥6,500 (N=44), Oita ¥5,900 (N=36) and Yamagata ¥5,600 (N=17). For dinner premiums by prefecture limited to business hotels, see also Dinner Premium by Prefecture: Two-Meal Plans at Business Hotels.
* Paired comparison of “half board” vs “breakfast included” within the same hotel. Ryokan, where half board is standard, rarely offer a matching breakfast-only plan, so they are excluded; these are hotel-segment values. The national median is the median of the 47 prefectures’ values.
Source: Compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team from MetroEngines Research
This comparison is limited to hotels and excludes ryokan, which make up 70% of the top 100. Still, the prefecture-level differences in dinner premiums offer pricing cues for ryokan operators too. In Hyogo and Mie, the market accepts dinner premiums of ¥10,000 or more (for Mie’s step-ups by segment, see Mie Meal Premium Analysis). In areas where brand names such as Yonezawa beef and Oita Wagyu come up repeatedly in reviews, there appears to be room to widen dinner premiums.
Specifically, three points are likely starting points. First, state the brand name, cut and cooking method in plan names and menus. Reviews remember brand and dish together — “Yonezawa beef kaiseki”, “Kobe beef shabu-shabu” — and the more clearly that comes across at booking, the better the match with expectations. Second, a tiered design that leverages seafood pairings. More than 20% of wagyu co-mentions involve seafood, so one option is a structure that shows the premium in steps — for example, a seafood kaiseki base with one wagyu dish added, and a higher-tier plan with wagyu as the main course. Third, make use of the winter demand season. In most producing areas winter rates exceed autumn, and setting higher-tier branded-beef plans to coincide with the year-end holidays and crab season makes it easier to aim for a rate uplift.
The finding that wagyu is more likely to be talked about at inns with fewer than 30 rooms is also worth noting. Small inns buy in smaller quantities, making it easier to handle rare cuts and local beef brands. As with Yukara, which features Biratori Wagyu, a dinner that puts the producing area front and center can become an asset that drives repeat stays and direct-by-name bookings, even without a nationally known brand.
Where the premiums rank by prefecture — Tottori, Tochigi, Oita and Yamagata at 41st–46th of 47
Placing the premiums from the previous section among all 47 prefectures splits the six prefectures with many wagyu inns clearly into two groups. On the half-board premium for October 2026 stays (hotel segment, paired comparison within the same hotel), Hyogo ranks 2nd nationally at ¥13,400 and Mie 6th at ¥10,900. Tottori ranks 41st, Tochigi 43rd, Oita 45th and Yamagata 46th — all below the national median of ¥8,200. Over the seven months from May to November 2026, Hyogo moved within ¥13,100–¥15,200, Mie ¥10,200–¥11,900 and Tottori ¥6,500–¥6,700. In every one of the seven months, Hyogo and Mie were above the national median and Tottori, Tochigi, Oita and Yamagata below it, so the ranking is not specific to October.
| Prefecture | Top 100 | Premium | Premium rate | N (properties) | Rank of 47 | May–Nov range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyogo | 11 | ¥13,400 | +38.8% | 71 | 2nd | ¥13,100〜¥15,200 |
| Mie | 19 | ¥10,900 | +41.8% | 46 | 6th | ¥10,200〜¥11,900 |
| Tottori | 6 | ¥6,600 | +34.6% | 19 | 41st | ¥6,500〜¥6,700 |
| Tochigi | 7 | ¥6,500 | +21.6% | 44 | 43rd | ¥6,300〜¥7,500 |
| Oita | 7 | ¥5,900 | +25.0% | 36 | 45th | ¥5,900〜¥7,600 |
| Yamagata | 12 | ¥5,600 | +27.6% | 17 | 46th | ¥3,800〜¥5,600 |
| National (median of 47 prefectures) | — | ¥8,200 | +29.8% | — | — | — |
* Premium of “half board” over “breakfast included” within the same hotel (listed-price basis, 2 guests per room, per room, tax included). Ryokan rarely offer a matching breakfast-only plan, so these are hotel-segment values. “Top 100” is the count from Table 1. “May–Nov range” is the monthly min–max for May–November 2026 stays; Yamagata (N=15–18) swings considerably month to month.
Source: Compiled from MetroEngines Research and HotelBank Editorial Team research (NLP analysis of guest reviews)
Although reviews repeatedly name Yonezawa beef, Oita Wagyu, Tochigi Wagyu and Tottori Wagyu, these prefectures’ dinner premiums sit near the bottom nationally. Table 5 estimates the incremental dinner-premium revenue from raising the premium, using Yamagata’s ¥5,600 as the base, for each half-board take-up rate (the share of guests choosing half board). Raising the premium by ¥2,000 adds about ¥1 million per 1,000 room-nights sold at a 50% take-up rate. Even if the price rise reduces the number of guests choosing half board, premium revenue does not fall below its pre-increase level until the take-up rate drops from 50% to 36.8%.
| Increase (base ¥5,600) | Take-up 30% | Take-up 50% | Take-up 70% | Break-even from 50% take-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| +¥1,000 | ¥300,000 | ¥500,000 | ¥700,000 | 42.4% |
| +¥2,000 | ¥600,000 | ¥1,000,000 | ¥1,400,000 | 36.8% |
| +¥2,600 (national median level) | ¥780,000 | ¥1,300,000 | ¥1,820,000 | 34.1% |
* Increment = increase × take-up rate × 1,000 room-nights. Break-even = ¥5,600 × 50% ÷ (¥5,600 + increase), i.e. the take-up rate at which premium revenue equals the pre-increase level (50% take-up). Higher ingredient costs are not considered. This is a mechanical estimate based on a hotel-segment prefecture value, not a pricing recommendation for any individual property.
Source: Estimated by HotelBank Editorial Team based on MetroEngines Research premium data
When carving out a branded-beef dinner as a higher-tier plan, the precondition for maintaining take-up is being able to show, through the plan name and menu, a difference in content (cut, portion, cooking method) that justifies the increase. In areas where guests remember the brand name together with the dish, that explanation is likely to land more easily.
Summary
The top 100 properties with the most positive wagyu reviews were concentrated in Mie (19), Yamagata (12) and Hyogo (11) — the three prefectures of Matsusaka, Yonezawa and Kobe (Tajima) beef. By mention rate, small inns in Yonezawa took the top spots, and the smaller the property, the more likely wagyu was to be the topic of conversation. Wagyu was often mentioned together with seafood, and in most producing municipalities winter estimated settled ADR exceeded autumn. Dinners that state the brand name, and tiered plans that combine wagyu with seafood, are likely to be strong options for raising rates in the winter demand season.
FAQ
Q. Which prefectures have the most inns with wagyu reviews?
A. Among the top 100, Mie (19), Yamagata (12) and Hyogo (11) lead, followed by Oita and Tochigi (7 each) and Tottori (6). By municipality, Yonezawa City in Yamagata has the most with 9.
Q. What does the mention rate represent?
A. The share of a property’s total reviews that refer positively to wagyu. It is not a rating score; it represents how often wagyu comes up as a topic.
Q. With what kinds of dinners is wagyu praised?
A. Seafood and sashimi are mentioned in the same review most often, in more than 20% of cases, followed by dinner buffets, crab and kaiseki.
Q. In producing areas with many wagyu inns, how much do winter rates rise?
A. Comparing ryokan estimated settled ADR (municipal median) in autumn (Sep–Oct 2025) and winter (Dec 2025–Feb 2026), Arima Onsen (Kita Ward, Kobe) rose from ¥31,400 to ¥39,100 (+24.6%), Shima +41.0% and Yonezawa +22.9%. Nasu was roughly flat at -3.6%.
Q. How much do half-board premiums differ by prefecture?
A. For October 2026 stays (hotel segment, paired comparison within the same hotel), Hyogo is high at ¥13,400 (2nd nationally) and Mie at ¥10,900 (6th), while Tottori, Tochigi, Oita and Yamagata are at ¥5,600–¥6,600, ranking 41st–46th of 47 prefectures. The national median is ¥8,200.
Related Articles
- 361 Crab Inns by Reviews: Small Inns 38%, Kyotango Winter ADR 2.3x
- Crab Season 2026 Opens Nov 6: 613 Inns, Rates Up to 3.6x in Echizen
- Top 20 Hotels for Local Breakfasts in Japan: Median ¥1,500 Add-On
- Hyogo Hotels: Breakfast Adds 21.0% to Room-Only, Half Board +45.4%
Further Reading
- Dinner Premium Median +28.3% / ¥4,451: Two-Meal Plans by Prefecture
- Mie Meal Premiums: Breakfast +9–19%, Half Board +36–39% (Sept 2026)
- Hyogo’s Hotel Market in 5 Layers 2026: ADR from ¥10,700 to ¥29,600
- Oita Meal Premiums: Business Breakfast +10.6%, Half-Board +39.3%
- Mie Hotel Investment 2026: City ADR Spans 4.3x, ¥10–15k Band Just 15%
- Oita Hotel Investment Map 2026: Yufuin ¥23k, Beppu ¥15k, Oita ¥7k ADR
- Crab Season 2026: Ryokan Rates Up to 44% Above October Saturdays
- Toba 72-Room All-Inclusive Rebrand: Aug ADR ¥47.3k, +39.6% YoY
References and Sources
■ Data sources
NLP analysis of guest reviews (positive mentions of wagyu and branded beef, last 24 months; the 100 properties with the most mentions among those with 20+ reviews and 10+ mentions; aggregated on November 4, 2026); MetroEngines Research municipal estimated settled ADR (ryokan, closed months September 2025–February 2026) and meal-plan price gaps within the same hotel (May–November 2026 stays, 2 guests per room); Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Geographical Indication (GI) registration information.
■ Estimation assumptions
Autumn is the simple average of monthly values for September and October 2025; winter for December 2025–February 2026. Premiums are the average of paired comparisons of “half board” vs “breakfast included” within the same hotel; the national value is the median of the 47 prefectures’ values. Table 5 increments = increase × take-up rate × 1,000 room-nights; break-even is the take-up rate at which premium revenue equals the pre-increase level (50% take-up), excluding ingredient costs.
■ Limitations
Mention rate measures how often the topic comes up and does not indicate a property’s rating or quality. Co-mention counts are aggregated per combination and are lower bounds. Total review counts shift slightly from day to day because the 24-month window moves at the time of aggregation. Premiums are hotel-segment values and exclude ryokan, which make up about 70% of the top 100. Municipalities with fewer than 15 covered properties show large monthly swings and should be read as ranges.
- HotelBank Editorial Team research — NLP analysis of guest reviews (positive mentions of wagyu and branded beef, top 100 properties, last 24 months, 92,658 reviews in total)
- MetroEngines Research — Municipal estimated settled ADR (ryokan, closed months September 2025–February 2026); meal-plan price gaps within the same hotel (October 2026 stays)
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Geographical Indication (GI) Registered Product No. 25: Tokusan Matsusaka Ushi (Japanese)
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Geographical Indication (GI) Registered Product No. 26: Yonezawa Gyu (Japanese)
- Japan Tourism Agency, Overnight Travel Statistics Survey (Japanese)
