We measured the price gap between “room-only” and “breakfast-included” plans sold within the same property — the so-called meal premium — for hotels in Tokyo, using stays in October 2026. The premium was +13.2% at city hotels (paired comparison, N=64 properties) and +8.8% at business hotels (N=356 properties). That is 3.7pt and 2.5pt narrower than September’s +16.9% (N=65) and +11.3% (N=361), and current November sales show the gap holding at the narrower level: +13.3% (N=64) and +8.7% (N=354). Meanwhile, the step from breakfast-included to half board (breakfast and dinner) is larger than the breakfast step: +20.9% (N=26) at city hotels and +12.2% (N=38) at business hotels in October. In this article we set this “narrowed gap” against the seasonal shape of estimated settled ADR to explain why it happened, and — together with differences across Tokyo’s wards — lay out a yardstick for pricing meal plans for the year-end season.
Scope: paired comparison of city and business hotels in Tokyo that sell both a room-only and a breakfast-included plan (or both a breakfast-included and a half-board plan) within the same property. For October 2026, breakfast-included vs room-only covers N=64 city hotels and N=356 business hotels. Ryokan are excluded. Meal premiums are shown as rates (%) only; yen price levels are supplemented with estimated settled ADR (the settled price level estimated from OTA and other sales data, tax-excluded equivalent). Occupancy is an estimate based on OTA-listed inventory. All definitions are at the end of the article. Data as of November 6, 2026.
• ADR (average daily rate) = an estimated settled rate (tax-excluded equivalent), calculated by applying segment-specific correction factors to the lowest plan price each property publishes on OTAs (per room, two guests per room, tax-included). Checked against the property-level results disclosed by listed hotel REITs (91 properties, most recent 3 months), the median error is about 7%. These are estimates and differ from each property’s actual settled prices and accounting figures.
• Area-level ADR (prefecture / municipality) is the median of the estimated settled rates of the properties covered (the level of a typical property in the area).
• Where listed prices are mentioned, they are per-room rates for two guests per room (tax-included).
• OCC (occupancy) = the share of rooms sold out of the total room count in the area (an estimate based on OTA sales inventory).
• Source: MetroEngines Research (continuously tracks OTA public prices for about 168,000 properties in Japan, of which about 27,000 have confirmed occupancy data)
- — City +13.2%, business +8.8%: breakfast-included vs room-only in Tokyo, October 2026 (N=64 / 356). Down 3.7pt and 2.5pt from September, and holding at the same level in November (current estimate).
- — The denominator drove the narrowing: in the paired data, from August to October room-only prices rose +39.1% (city) and +36.9% (business), while the breakfast add-on amount changed +3.6% (city) and −10.1% (business) (listed-price basis).
- — Ward spread of +1.5% to +13.2%: among wards with 10+ business-hotel pairs, from Koto Ward to Chuo Ward. The half-board step is 1.4–1.6x the breakfast step, but pair counts are small and month-to-month swings are large.
How We Measure the “Meal Premium” — Why We Limit It to Paired Comparisons Within the Same Property
As a premise, the meal premium in this article is the price difference between room-only and breakfast-included plans within the same hotel, expressed as a rate. If you simply averaged hotels that sell breakfast plans and hotels that sell room-only and took the difference, you would end up measuring differences in property grade rather than the value of the meal, because breakfast tends to be offered by higher-priced properties. We therefore extracted only cases where the same property sold both plans in the same month, and compared the two plan prices within that property. Note that N= is the number of properties selling both plans (the number of pairs), not the total number of properties in the market.
As a consequence of this method, the sample is limited to properties that sell room-only and breakfast-included plans side by side. Most ryokan use one night with two meals as their base offering, so pairs with room-only plans rarely form; we therefore exclude them. Deluxe hotels are shown in the table for reference, but in line with the theme, the main focus of the analysis below is city hotels and business hotels.
The Breakfast Gap Widened in Summer and Narrowed in Autumn — May to November
Tracking the breakfast premium month by month from May, city hotels widened from +14.5% in May (N=61) to +17.7% in August (N=65), then narrowed via +16.9% in September to +13.2% in October (N=64). Business hotels followed the same shape: +11.2% in May (N=358) opened to +13.3% in July and August (N=365 / 361), then shrank to +11.3% in September and +8.8% in October (N=356). November, estimated from current sales, sits at almost the same level as October: city +13.3% (N=64) and business +8.7% (N=354). Read together with Tokyo Meal Premiums Sep 2026, which broke down Tokyo’s September gap by segment and ward, this confirms that the narrowing took hold after October began.
What stands out here is that the shape — premium peaking in August and bottoming in October–November — is the exact inverse of the seasonal shape of Tokyo room rates. As shown below, Tokyo’s estimated settled ADR hits its low for the year in August and its high in October–November. It is more natural to read the months when the breakfast gap narrowed in rate terms not as months when breakfast became cheaper, but as months when the room rate — the denominator — went up.
Figure 1: Tokyo meal premium, breakfast-included vs room-only (paired comparison within the same property, May–November 2026; November is an estimate based on current sales). Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
| Segment | Comparison pair | Sep | Oct | Nov (current estimate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City hotels | Breakfast vs room-only | +16.9% (N=65) | +13.2% (N=64) | +13.3% (N=64) |
| Half board vs breakfast | +29.3% (N=26) | +20.9% (N=26) | +20.8% (N=26) | |
| Half board vs room-only | +56.0% (N=26) | +41.4% (N=26) | +41.3% (N=26) | |
| Business hotels | Breakfast vs room-only | +11.3% (N=361) | +8.8% (N=356) | +8.7% (N=354) |
| Half board vs breakfast | +15.7% (N=37) | +12.2% (N=38) | +11.8% (N=37) | |
| Half board vs room-only | +30.4% (N=37) | +24.7% (N=38) | +24.3% (N=37) | |
| Deluxe hotels (reference) | Breakfast vs room-only | +17.0% (N=22) | +12.4% (N=22) | +13.3% (N=22) |
| Half board vs breakfast | +21.6% (N=16) | +15.7% (N=16) | +18.1% (N=15) |
N= is the number of properties selling both plans within the same property (number of pairs). November is an estimate based on current sales and may change. September values reflect the latest aggregation and may differ in the decimal place from figures in our September article. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
The Half-Board Step Is 1.4–1.6x the Breakfast Step — but Pair Counts Are Small
Looking at the step from adding one more meal, city hotels in October priced half board +20.9% (N=26) above breakfast-included, about 1.6x the +13.2% step from room-only to breakfast. Business hotels showed +12.2% (N=38), about 1.4x their +8.8% breakfast step; in both segments the step that adds dinner is larger than the breakfast step. From room-only all the way to half board, the spread is +41.4% for city hotels and +24.7% for business hotels.
That said, only 26 city hotels and 38 business hotels in Tokyo sell half board alongside room-only, a much smaller base than the breakfast pairs (64 and 356 properties). The fact that the city-hotel half-board step narrowed by 8.4pt from September to October (+29.3% → +20.9%), a bigger swing than the 3.7pt narrowing of the breakfast step, should be read as a sign that with so few pairs the rate moves easily when a few properties change their plan mix. The half-board step is best treated as a range that includes its month-to-month variation. The pattern of the dinner step exceeding the breakfast step is not unique to Tokyo; it also appears in Osaka in the same October (see Osaka Breakfast Premium: City +14.4%, Business +9.9% for details).
Figure 2: Tokyo meal-plan steps (paired comparison within the same property, September and October 2026). For N=, see Table 1. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
The Denominator, Not Breakfast, Drove the Narrowing — Seasonal Shape of Estimated Settled ADR and Estimated OCC
To check what lay behind the autumn narrowing of the premium rate, we look at Tokyo’s estimated settled ADR (tax-excluded equivalent), comparing finalized months with finalized months. City hotels posted ¥31,700 in October 2026 (N=109 properties), −0.7% against ¥32,000 a year earlier (N=106); September was ¥24,700 (N=110), −10.3% against ¥27,500 a year earlier (N=107). Business hotels posted ¥17,500 in October (N=913), +14.0% against ¥15,300 a year earlier (N=897), and ¥13,400 in September (N=914), +2.2% against ¥13,100 (N=894) — so business hotels came in well above the prior year in October. November, estimated from current sales, is at the highest level of the year: ¥33,000 for city hotels (N=108) and ¥19,200 for business hotels (N=898) (a direct comparison with finalized figures must wait until the month closes). Where this summer’s decline came from and how far it has recovered is tracked across three years of finalized data in Tokyo August ADR: City Hotels −20.6%, Business −8.9%.
Overlaying this on the shape in Figure 1, August — the peak month for the breakfast premium rate — was the low point for room rates: ¥21,300 for city hotels (N=109, −20.6% against ¥26,800 a year earlier) and ¥11,600 for business hotels (N=915, −8.9% against ¥12,700 a year earlier). October–November, the bottom of the premium rate, corresponds to the peak in room rates. If the breakfast add-on amount does not move much from month to month, the rate shrinks mechanically by as much as the room-rate denominator rose from August to October. Checking this on a listed-price basis with the same paired data, the room-only price (the denominator) rose sharply from August to October, +39.1% for city hotels and +36.9% for business hotels, while the breakfast add-on amount changed only +3.6% and −10.1% respectively. Holding the add-on at its August amount and moving only the denominator to its October level brings the rate down to +12.7% for city hotels and +9.7% for business hotels, so the denominator explains most of the narrowing (Table 2-2). For business hotels, however, the add-on amount itself also fell by about 10%, accounting for roughly 1pt of the 4.5pt narrowing from August to October.
The demand side points in the same direction. Tokyo’s estimated OCC (OTA-listed inventory basis, October 2026 stay dates; 52 city hotels / 15,932 rooms and 541 business hotels / 78,056 rooms, using the most frequent count within the month) stayed high, averaging 95.0% for city hotels and 95.8% for business hotels for the month. September 2026 was also 90.0% for city hotels (54 properties / 17,294 rooms) and 90.3% for business hotels (547 properties / 78,977 rooms); in both months, room rates stepped up to their autumn peak while inventory was tight. Room rates climbed in this phase, while the breakfast add-on did not move as much as room rates — that is what the data shows behind the narrowing of the rate (we have not tallied whether individual properties revised their prices).
| Month | City est. settled ADR | YoY | City breakfast premium | Business est. settled ADR | YoY | Business breakfast premium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2026 (final) | ¥21,265 (N=109) | −20.6% | +17.7% (N=65) | ¥11,554 (N=915) | −8.9% | +13.3% (N=361) |
| Sep 2026 (final) | ¥24,650 (N=110) | −10.3% | +16.9% (N=65) | ¥13,364 (N=914) | +2.2% | +11.3% (N=361) |
| Oct 2026 (final) | ¥31,731 (N=109) | −0.7% | +13.2% (N=64) | ¥17,491 (N=913) | +14.0% | +8.8% (N=356) |
| Nov 2026 (current estimate) | ¥32,985 (N=108) | — | +13.3% (N=64) | ¥19,215 (N=898) | — | +8.7% (N=354) |
Estimated settled ADR YoY compares finalized months only. November is an estimate based on current sales; a direct comparison with finalized figures must wait until the month closes. N= for the breakfast premium is the number of pairs; N= for ADR is the number of properties estimated. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
| Segment | Aug rate | Simulation: add-on held at Aug, denominator at Oct | Oct rate | Denominator effect | Add-on amount effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City hotels | +17.7% (N=65) | +12.7% | +13.2% (N=64) | −5.0pt | +0.5pt |
| Business hotels | +13.3% (N=361) | +9.7% | +8.8% (N=356) | −3.6pt | −0.9pt |
Simulation with the denominator moved first; effects are differences between values displayed to one decimal place. Based on paired listed-price data, which differs in basis from estimated settled ADR. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
The Gap Ranges From 1.5% to 13% by Ward — Thick in Chuo, Thin on the Bayfront and Airport Side
Even among business hotels in Tokyo, the breakfast gap varies widely by ward. Ranking October 2026 breakfast-included vs room-only across wards with 10+ pairs, the thickest is Chuo Ward at +13.2% (N=61), followed near the Tokyo average of +8.8% by Shinagawa Ward +10.8% (N=17), Chiyoda Ward +9.5% (N=29) and Toshima Ward +8.9% (N=23). Taito Ward +8.3% (N=43), Minato Ward +7.8% (N=43), Bunkyo Ward +7.2% (N=11) and Shinjuku Ward +6.4% (N=22) sit slightly below average, while Shibuya Ward +4.3% (N=10), Ota Ward +4.0% (N=21) and Koto Ward +1.5% (N=11) show almost no gap.
The change from September also differs by area. Chuo Ward narrowed 4.1pt from +17.3% to +13.2% and Shinjuku Ward 3.7pt from +10.1% to +6.4%, whereas Ota Ward narrowed only 1.1pt from +5.1% to +4.0%, and Koto Ward (+0.1% → +1.5%) and Edogawa Ward (+0.4% → +2.0%, N=8) actually widened slightly. Wards like Chuo that had set a thick breakfast gap saw their rate eroded more by the autumn rise in room rates, while bayfront and airport-side wards, where the gap was thin to begin with, had little room to move.
For city hotels, pair counts per ward thin out to single digits, so the figures are for reference only, but in October the order was Shinjuku Ward +14.3% (N=7), Minato Ward +13.8% (N=12), Chuo Ward +10.3% (N=13) and Chiyoda Ward +7.6% (N=7). That Chuo Ward — the thickest for business hotels — sits mid-table for city hotels suggests the breakfast gap reflects not just ward characteristics but the accumulation of where each property places breakfast within its price band.
Figure 3: Tokyo business hotels, breakfast-included vs room-only premium rate (by ward, October 2026, wards with 10+ pairs). Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
| Ward / city | Sep | Oct | Sep → Oct | Nov (current estimate) | Pairs (Oct) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuo Ward | +17.3% | +13.2% | −4.1pt | +12.8% | 61 |
| Taito Ward | +10.5% | +8.3% | −2.2pt | +8.9% | 43 |
| Minato Ward | +10.2% | +7.8% | −2.4pt | +8.0% | 43 |
| Chiyoda Ward | +12.0% | +9.5% | −2.5pt | +9.3% | 29 |
| Toshima Ward | +11.9% | +8.9% | −3.0pt | +9.4% | 23 |
| Shinjuku Ward | +10.1% | +6.4% | −3.7pt | +5.4% | 22 |
| Ota Ward | +5.1% | +4.0% | −1.1pt | +3.9% | 21 |
| Shinagawa Ward | +12.7% | +10.8% | −1.9pt | +11.3% | 17 |
| Koto Ward | +0.1% | +1.5% | +1.4pt | +5.4% | 11 |
| Bunkyo Ward | +6.5% | +7.2% | +0.7pt | +5.3% | 11 |
| Shibuya Ward | +11.5% | +4.3% | −7.2pt | +2.6% | 10 |
| Edogawa Ward | +0.4% | +2.0% | +1.6pt | +0.7% | 8 |
| Sumida Ward | +14.7% | +13.8% | −0.9pt | +14.1% | 6 |
| Hachioji City | +11.1% | +11.5% | +0.4pt | +14.4% (N=5) | 6 |
| Machida City | +10.3% | +6.5% | −3.8pt | +6.8% | 6 |
| Tachikawa City | +7.9% | +5.4% | −2.5pt | +4.9% | 5 |
| Tokyo (all business hotels) | +11.3% | +8.8% | −2.5pt | +8.7% | 356 |
Pair counts in September and November differ by roughly 1–2 properties (September: Edogawa Ward 8, Bunkyo Ward 11, Shinjuku Ward 23, etc.). Wards and cities with fewer than 10 pairs are for reference only. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
For Revenue Managers at Tokyo City and Business Hotels — Implications and Action Plan
1. Benchmark your own breakfast gap against the market in both “rate” and “amount.” This article’s benchmark is October breakfast-included vs room-only: city +13.2% (N=64) and business +8.8% (N=356). Calculate, month by month, how many percent above room-only your breakfast plan is priced, and set it alongside these rates. The main reason the market rate shrank from +17.7% / +13.3% in August to October was the rise in the room-rate denominator (for business hotels, a smaller add-on also contributed about 1pt). If you kept your breakfast add-on unchanged in months when your room rates rose, your rate will have narrowed in the same way. The narrowing itself is not a problem; the question is whether it was intended.
2. High-rate months are when breakfast looks “relatively cheap.” In October–November, when room rates are at their peak for the year (estimated settled ADR of ¥31,700 / current estimate ¥33,000 for city hotels and ¥17,500 / ¥19,200 for business hotels), a breakfast priced as a fixed add-on looks inexpensive relative to the room rate. That is a tailwind for properties wanting to push guests toward breakfast plans; conversely, properties with limited breakfast-venue capacity may consider revising the add-on amount to keep the ratio constant.
3. Compare your position with your ward’s market. Business hotels in Chuo Ward maintain the thickest gap among wards with 10+ pairs at +13.2% (N=61), 9–12pt above Ota Ward +4.0% (N=21) and Koto Ward +1.5% (N=11). Compare your ward’s value with your own gap: if yours is thicker than the market, focus on measures that reinforce perceived value through breakfast content and price presentation; if thinner, focus on raising the share of breakfast-included bookings. Keep in mind, though, that ward values are an accumulation of each ward’s property price-band mix, so read them with a set of similarly priced properties in the same ward in mind.
4. Design half board with its range in mind. The step from breakfast-included to half board in October was +20.9% for city hotels (N=26) and +12.2% for business hotels (N=38), 1.4–1.6x the breakfast step, but its swing since September is larger than the breakfast step’s. When building dinner-inclusive plans for the year-end and New Year period, a realistic approach is to use the multiple of the breakfast step as a yardstick while allowing a range in your rate table on the assumption that it moves month to month.
| Timeframe | Action | Decision trigger (tied to figures in this article) | Goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today to this week | Calculate your breakfast gap (rate and amount) by month for May–November | The market narrowed from +17.7% → +13.2% (city) and +13.3% → +8.8% (business) between August and October. If your rate narrowed much more than this, your add-on may have been left unchanged for too long | Confirm whether changes in the gap were intended |
| Review November’s breakfast-included share (sales mix) | November’s market gap is city +13.3% and business +8.7% (current estimate) in a high-rate month. If your gap is thicker than the market yet your breakfast share is not growing, there is room to rethink presentation and content | Don’t miss the chance to steer guests to breakfast in high-rate months | |
| Within 2 weeks | Compare your gap with your ward’s market | If your gap is 3pt or more away from your ward’s business-hotel breakfast gap (Table 3), check that you can articulate why | Turn deviation from the market into intentional differentiation |
| Set December room rates and the breakfast add-on together | Since the market rate moves with the denominator, in months when you raise room rates decide explicitly whether to hold the rate or hold the amount for the breakfast add-on | Make gap design a deliberate decision rather than a by-product of room-rate changes | |
| Toward next month (year-end / New Year) | Design dinner and half-board plan steps as multiples | The market half-board step is 1.4–1.6x the breakfast step (October: city +20.9%, business +12.2%). If your settings deviate widely from this multiple, check the rationale | Have a yardstick for year-end and New Year meal plans |
| Schedule a gap review ahead of the room-rate trough from January onward | In months when room rates hit a trough, as in August, the same add-on amount widened the market rate to +17.7% / +13.3%. Check in advance that the gap won’t look excessive in slow months | Prevent breakfast plans from looking overpriced in low-rate months |
Summary — Three Yardsticks for Reading Meal Premiums
First, viewed as a rate, the breakfast gap moves with the seasons. In Tokyo, October 2026 came in at city +13.2% (N=64) and business +8.8% (N=356), 3.7pt and 2.5pt narrower than September, but the main cause was the denominator effect of the autumn rise in room rates. From August to October the breakfast add-on amount was nearly flat for city hotels at +3.6%, while for business hotels it fell −10.1%, so a shrinking add-on ran alongside. Second, each extra meal step adds more for dinner than for breakfast: in October, half board vs breakfast-included was city +20.9% (N=26) and business +12.2% (N=38), 1.4–1.6x the breakfast step — though pair counts are small and month-to-month swings are large. Third, ward differences span more than 10pt, from Chuo Ward +13.2% (N=61) to Koto Ward +1.5% (N=11), and wards with thicker gaps tended to narrow more in autumn. Recording your own gap in both rate and amount, and deciding whether to “hold the rate or hold the amount” in line with the peaks and troughs of room rates, is the starting point for designing year-end meal plans.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. Is “N=” in the meal premium the total number of hotels?
A. No. N= is the number of properties that sold both plans being compared (e.g., room-only and breakfast-included) in the same month within the same property — that is, the number of pairs. It is not the total number of business hotels in Tokyo; the base differs by comparison pair, with 356 properties for the October breakfast pairs and 38 for the half-board pairs.
Q. Did the meal premium shrink in October because breakfast discounts spread?
A. That is not the main cause. October–November, the bottom of the breakfast premium rate, is when Tokyo’s estimated settled ADR peaks for the year, while August, the premium’s peak, was the ADR trough. In the paired data (listed-price basis), from August to October room-only prices rose +39.1% (city) and +36.9% (business), while the breakfast add-on amount changed +3.6% (city) and −10.1% (business), so most of the narrowing is explained by the rise in the denominator. For business hotels, however, the add-on amount itself also fell by about 10%.
Q. Are ryokan and deluxe hotels included?
A. Ryokan are excluded, because many use one night with two meals as their base and rarely form pairs with room-only plans. Deluxe hotels are shown in Table 1 for reference, but the main focus of this analysis is city hotels and business hotels.
About the Data
| Item | Definition / scope |
|---|---|
| Meal premium (paired comparison) | Covers only properties that sold both of the two meal plans being compared (room-only / breakfast-included / half board) in the same stay month within the same property, and expresses the price difference between plans of the same conditions sold on OTAs and elsewhere as a rate. Because it does not compare different groups of properties, it measures the meal-plan step rather than differences in property grade. N= is the number of properties selling both plans (number of pairs). Ryokan are excluded. Prefecture- and ward/city-level figures are cited only with 5+ pairs; fewer than 10 are treated as reference values. Months are stay months; November 2026 is an estimate based on current sales and may change. Rates of change in room-only prices and add-on amounts compare monthly averages of listed prices (two guests per room, tax-included) in the same paired data; pair composition differs slightly by month. Aggregated as of November 2, 2026. |
| Estimated settled ADR | A settled price level (tax-excluded equivalent) estimated from OTA and other sales data (lowest plan level × segment-specific factor, ensemble of multiple channels). Past months are finalized values; current and future months are estimates based on current sales. Median error of 6.6% against published operating results. Tokyo city hotels N=104–110 properties; business hotels N=892–924 properties (varies by month). YoY compares finalized months only. |
| Estimated OCC (OTA-listed inventory basis) | OTA-listed-inventory occupancy = 100 − 100 × OTA-listed remaining rooms ÷ total rooms. Based on a fixed cohort of properties that list at least 30% of their rooms on OTAs (the same set of properties for each stay date). This is an estimate based on how OTA-sold inventory is absorbed, and its definition differs from actual room occupancy (rooms not listed are counted as sold, so it tends to read higher). The number of properties covered varies slightly by stay date, so property and room counts in the text are the most frequent values within the month. Months covered: September and October 2026 (Tokyo, city and business hotels). |
| Booking curve / observation window | Based on observations from 45 days before the stay date to the most recent date. |
| Breakdown of N= | Meal premium (October, breakfast-included vs room-only): 64 city hotels, 356 business hotels, 22 deluxe hotels. Half board vs breakfast-included: 26 city hotels, 38 business hotels. Estimated settled ADR (October): 109 city hotels, 913 business hotels. Estimated OCC (October): 52 city hotels / 15,932 rooms; 541 business hotels / 78,056 rooms. |
| Data as of | Data as of November 6, 2026. Because sales and inventory change daily, the figures in this article are a snapshot at the time of retrieval. |
Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
Related Articles
- Tokyo Meal Premiums Sep 2026: Breakfast +11.3%, City Half-Board +29.3%
- Tokyo August ADR: City Hotels −20.6%, Business −8.9%; September Splits
- Tokyo Sep 2026 Settled ADR: Business +2.2% YoY, City Hotels −10.3%
- Osaka Breakfast Premium: City +14.4%, Business +9.9%; Dinner +29.6%
- Hyogo Hotels: Breakfast Adds 21.0% to Room-Only, Half Board +45.4%
- Hiroshima Meal Premiums: City Breakfast +16.8%, Half-Board Reverses
- Fukuoka Meal Premiums: City Breakfast +15.2%, Business Wins Half-Board