We matched meal plans that hotels in Fukuoka Prefecture are selling for October 2026 stays, pairing each hotel’s own “room-only” and “with breakfast” plans. Adding breakfast raised the price by +15.2% at city hotels (a difference of ¥5,717, N=30 pairs) and by +7.7% at business hotels (¥1,595, N=144 pairs). On the breakfast step, city hotels charge a premium nearly twice the ratio of business hotels. On the step from “with breakfast” to “half-board” (breakfast and dinner), the order reverses on a ratio basis: +23.6% for city hotels (N=18) versus +29.2% for business hotels (N=52). This article reads these meal premiums from four angles — prefecture, month, city/ward, and cross-prefecture comparison — and sets out a “step benchmark” that Fukuoka’s city and business hotels can use when designing meal plans for autumn and winter.
Scope: city hotels and business hotels in Fukuoka Prefecture (ryokan excluded). Meal premiums are paired comparisons limited to properties that sell both meal types within the same hotel: with breakfast vs room-only, city N=30 / business N=144; half-board vs with breakfast, city N=18 / business N=52. For price levels, this article uses only estimated settled ADR (the settled price level estimated from OTA and other sales data, tax-excluded equivalent); meal premiums are expressed only as ratios and differences. Definitions are given at the end of the article. Data as of: October 23, 2026.
• ADR (average daily rate) = an estimated settled rate (tax-excluded equivalent), calculated by applying segment-specific adjustment factors to the lowest-priced plan each property publishes on OTAs (per-room rate for two guests, tax included). Checked against property-level results disclosed by listed hotel REITs (91 properties, most recent 3 months), the median error is approximately 7%. These are estimates and differ from each property’s actual settled prices and accounting figures.
• Area-level ADR (prefecture, city/ward) is the median of the estimated settled rates of the covered properties (the level of a typical property in the area).
• Where listed prices are mentioned, they are per-room rates for two guests (tax included).
• OCC (occupancy) = the share of rooms sold relative to total rooms in the area (an estimate based on OTA sales inventory).
• Source: MetroEngines Research (continuous tracking of OTA published prices for approximately 168,000 properties in Japan, of which approximately 27,000 are confirmed as operating)
- — Breakfast adds +15.2% at city hotels and +7.7% at business hotels (October 2026 stays, same-hotel pairs, N=30 / 144). The city-hotel difference of ¥5,717 is 3.6 times the business-hotel difference of ¥1,595.
- — On half-board vs with breakfast, business hotels at +29.2% exceed city hotels at +23.6%. Business hotels use a step design of “breakfast as the entry point, dinner as the rate driver.”
- — The breakfast ratio thins in autumn: city hotels went from +19.8% in July to +15.2% in October. The difference stayed broadly constant at about ¥5,700–6,400, so the main driver appears to be a rising room-only rate in the denominator.
- — The business-hotel breakfast premium of +7.7% is the thinnest of the eight major prefectures, while the half-board step ranks just behind Osaka (+29.6%). Within the prefecture, Hakata Ward is the thickest at +9.5% (¥2,407).
How We Measure Meal Premiums — Same-Hotel Paired Comparisons Only
First, the definition of “meal premium” used in this article. The figures here are drawn from plan prices on sale through OTAs and other channels, and are calculated only where the same hotel sells both a room-only plan and a with-breakfast plan for the same month: we take the difference between the two and aggregate across the covered properties. Hotels that sell only a with-breakfast plan, or only room-only, cannot form a pair and are excluded. Ryokan, where meals are included as standard, are also excluded.
We use this method because a simple comparison of averages mixes in selection bias: hotels that sell with-breakfast plans tend to be skewed toward higher price bands in the first place. Limiting the analysis to within-hotel differences cancels out differences in location and room grade, which are common to both plans, leaving only “how much the price changes because a meal was added.” All figures below compare plans with the same number of guests, and ratios are the markup over the paired plan’s rate (room-only for room-only pairs, with breakfast for with-breakfast pairs). The N= attached to each figure is the number of hotels for which a pair could be formed.
Fukuoka’s Step Structure — City Hotels Lead on Breakfast, Business Hotels Lead on the Dinner Markup
Looking at Fukuoka Prefecture for October 2026 stays across four meal pairs, city and business hotels build their steps differently. On with breakfast vs room-only, city hotels came in at +15.2% (¥5,717 difference) against +7.7% (¥1,595) for business hotels — roughly twice the ratio and 3.6 times the difference. On the step from with breakfast to half-board, however, city hotels were at +23.6% (¥10,554, N=18) versus +29.2% (¥5,210, N=52) for business hotels, so business hotels are higher on a ratio basis. City hotels have the larger absolute difference, but measured against the base with-breakfast rate, dinner at business hotels is sold as a relatively “high step.”
| Meal pair | City hotels | Difference | N | Business hotels | Difference | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With breakfast vs room-only | +15.2% | ¥5,717 | 30 | +7.7% | ¥1,595 | 144 |
| Half-board vs with breakfast | +23.6% | ¥10,554 | 18 | +29.2% | ¥5,210 | 52 |
| Half-board vs room-only | +44.3% | ¥17,006 | 18 | +36.2% | ¥7,082 | 38 |
| Dinner only vs room-only | — | — | — | +13.7% | ¥3,208 | 10 |
Fukuoka Prefecture, October 2026 stays, same-hotel paired comparison. City-hotel “dinner only” is not shown because the number of pairs falls below the threshold. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
Meal premium (markup, %), Fukuoka Prefecture, October 2026 stays, same-hotel paired comparison. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
This structure points to different roles for meals in the two segments. At city hotels, breakfast stands as a product in its own right, and the ¥5,717 difference over room-only can be read as a level accepted as “payment for the breakfast-venue experience.” At business hotels, the breakfast difference is a small ¥1,595, a price point that keeps the psychological barrier to moving from room-only to with breakfast low. In exchange, half-board with dinner carries a markup of nearly 30% over with breakfast, reaching +36.2% (¥7,082, N=38) in total from room-only to half-board. The market-average picture for business-hotel meal plans is a step design of “breakfast as the entry point, dinner as the rate driver.” Note that the “all segments” breakfast premium is +10.4% (¥2,466, N=183) and half-board vs with breakfast is +29.2% (¥7,380, N=78); because “all segments” also includes properties outside these two segments, it does not equal the combination of the two.
Monthly Trend — A Breakfast Premium That Thickens in Summer and Thins in Autumn, Driven by Seasonal Base Rates
Next, we track the with breakfast vs room-only premium month by month from May 2026 to October 2026 stays. City hotels thickened from +17.3% in May (N=27) to +19.8% in July (N=30), then thinned for three consecutive months — +19.4% in August, +17.5% in September, and +15.2% in October — shrinking 4.6 points from July to October. Business hotels peaked for the period at +10.2% in May (N=132) and +10.4% in June, then declined steadily to +9.0% in July, +8.1% in August, +7.9% in September, and +7.7% in October, a contraction of 2.5 points from May to October.
With breakfast vs room-only meal premium (%), Fukuoka Prefecture, by 2026 stay month, same-hotel paired comparison (city N=27–30, business N=132–146). October is aggregated for a month still on sale and may change. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
A falling ratio, however, does not mean breakfast pricing has broken down. In difference terms, city hotels were at ¥5,886 in May, ¥6,210 in July, ¥6,400 in August, and ¥5,717 in October — some month-to-month variation, but broadly within a band of about ¥5,700 to ¥6,400. The main reason the ratio shrank is likely that the room-only rate in the denominator rose toward autumn. For business hotels, the difference narrowed by about ¥400, from ¥1,987 in May to ¥1,595 in October, so here the falling ratio was compounded by a shrinking difference itself.
This “rising denominator” is consistent with movements in estimated settled ADR. Comparing finalized figures, the estimated settled ADR for city hotels in Fukuoka Prefecture was ¥18,547 (N=43 properties) in September 2026, up +21.9% from ¥15,212 (N=37) in the same month a year earlier; business hotels were at ¥10,958 (N=342), up +9.9% from ¥9,972 (N=331). Given that last autumn (¥18,258 in October 2025 and ¥20,829 in November) was higher than the preceding summer, this year too is in a phase where base rates step up toward autumn, and holding a fixed breakfast difference naturally thins the ratio. The estimated settled ADR for October stays is an estimate based on current sales, so a straight comparison with finalized figures should wait until the month closes. The question of whether a breakfast premium can build a rate ladder as Fukuoka’s estimated settled ADR growth slows was covered earlier in Fukuoka Settled ADR Slows +14.4% to +3.6% — Breakfast Premium Next?
| Stay month | City est. settled ADR | N | Business est. settled ADR | N | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | ¥15,212 | 37 | ¥9,972 | 331 | Finalized |
| Oct 2025 | ¥18,258 | 38 | ¥10,450 | 335 | Finalized |
| Nov 2025 | ¥20,829 | 38 | ¥12,368 | 336 | Finalized |
| Aug 2026 | ¥18,479 | 41 | ¥10,837 | 341 | Finalized |
| Sep 2026 | ¥18,547 | 43 | ¥10,958 | 342 | Finalized (YoY: city +21.9%, business +9.9%) |
| Oct 2026 | ¥22,027 | 43 | ¥15,334 | 337 | Estimate based on current sales (subject to change) |
Fukuoka Prefecture, estimated settled ADR (tax-excluded equivalent). Finalized months show finalized values; October 2026 is an estimate based on current sales. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
The half-board vs with breakfast step, in contrast to breakfast, is stable. City hotels went from +23.4% in September (¥9,767, N=17) to +23.6% in October (¥10,554, N=18), and business hotels from +28.9% in September (¥4,877, N=52) to +29.2% in October (¥5,210, N=52) — ratios essentially flat while the differences actually widened. Because dinner is a “step with a cost behind it,” backed by menu content and procurement, it appears to be priced so that the ratio holds even as base rates move.
By City and Ward — Business-Hotel Breakfast in Hakata Ward at +9.5%, Above the Prefectural Average
Breaking the prefecture into areas, the business-hotel breakfast premium is thicker closer to the city center. For October 2026 stays, business-hotel with breakfast vs room-only was +9.5% in Hakata Ward (¥2,407 difference, N=57), +8.5% in Chuo Ward (¥2,075, N=27), +7.8% in Kokurakita Ward (¥1,328, N=14), and +7.8% in Kurume City (¥883, N=7). Hakata Ward is the thickest on both ratio and difference, and Kurume’s difference is just under 40% of Hakata’s. On an “all segments” basis, Kokurakita Ward (+13.7%, N=18) and Kurume City (+14.4%, N=11) exceed Hakata Ward (+9.4%, N=64), but this reflects differences in segment mix, including city hotels, and differs from the ranking when comparing business hotels with each other. Since the prefecture-wide business-hotel value (+7.7%) is below every one of these four areas, the step appears to be even thinner among properties outside them.
| City/Ward | Segment | Breakfast premium | Difference | N (pairs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hakata Ward | Business hotels | +9.5% | ¥2,407 | 57 |
| Hakata Ward | City hotels | +9.2% | ¥6,196 | 7 |
| Hakata Ward | All segments | +9.4% | ¥2,822 | 64 |
| Chuo Ward | Business hotels | +8.5% | ¥2,075 | 27 |
| Chuo Ward | City hotels | +14.5% | ¥6,793 | 7 |
| Chuo Ward | All segments | +10.5% | ¥3,047 | 34 |
| Kokurakita Ward | Business hotels | +7.8% | ¥1,328 | 14 |
| Kokurakita Ward | All segments | +13.7% | ¥2,547 | 18 |
| Kurume City | Business hotels | +7.8% | ¥883 | 7 |
| Kurume City | All segments | +14.4% | ¥1,908 | 11 |
With breakfast vs room-only meal premium, cities/wards in Fukuoka Prefecture, October 2026 stays, same-hotel paired comparison (only cities/wards and segments with 5 or more pairs). Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
City hotels in both Hakata and Chuo wards have only N=7, so the figures are for reference, but Hakata Ward at +9.2% (¥6,196) versus Chuo Ward at +14.5% (¥6,793) shows similar differences with a thicker ratio in Chuo Ward. City hotels in Hakata Ward have a higher room-only rate in the denominator, so the same ¥6,000-range breakfast difference looks thinner as a ratio. Business hotels in Hakata Ward dropped their ratio from +10.4% in September (¥2,399) to +9.5% in October (¥2,407) while holding the difference, suggesting that the prefecture-wide pattern of “a rising denominator thinning the ratio” is also occurring in the city center.
Cross-Prefecture Comparison — Fukuoka’s Business-Hotel Breakfast Is the Thinnest of 8 Major Prefectures, Its Half-Board Step Among the Highest
Placing Fukuoka’s steps alongside other major metropolitan areas clarifies its position. For October 2026 stays, business-hotel with breakfast vs room-only was +9.0% in Tokyo (N=354), +9.9% in Osaka (N=162), +7.9% in Aichi (N=140), +12.9% in Kyoto (N=70), +10.6% in Hokkaido (N=197), +9.5% in Hiroshima (N=66), and +11.9% in Kumamoto (N=45); Fukuoka’s +7.7% (N=144) is the thinnest of the eight prefectures listed. City-hotel breakfast in Fukuoka is +15.2% (N=30), fourth after Kumamoto +20.6% (N=14), Hokkaido +20.5% (N=49), and Hiroshima +16.8% (N=22), placing it mid-pack and above Tokyo +13.3% (N=64) and Osaka +14.4% (N=57).
With breakfast vs room-only meal premium (%), 8 major prefectures, October 2026 stays, same-hotel paired comparison. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
| Prefecture | Breakfast, city | Breakfast, business | Half-board vs breakfast, city | Half-board vs breakfast, business |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fukuoka | +15.2% (N=30) | +7.7% (N=144) | +23.6% (N=18) | +29.2% (N=52) |
| Tokyo | +13.3% (N=64) | +9.0% (N=354) | +20.8% (N=26) | +12.3% (N=38) |
| Osaka | +14.4% (N=57) | +9.9% (N=162) | +26.5% (N=21) | +29.6% (N=24) |
| Aichi | +10.5% (N=23) | +7.9% (N=140) | +32.6% (N=14) | +16.2% (N=37) |
| Kyoto | +13.6% (N=29) | +12.9% (N=70) | +24.6% (N=22) | +28.6% (N=16) |
| Hokkaido | +20.5% (N=49) | +10.6% (N=197) | +30.6% (N=26) | +23.8% (N=44) |
| Hiroshima | +16.8% (N=22) | +9.5% (N=66) | +22.6% (N=13) | +27.3% (N=21) |
| Kumamoto | +20.6% (N=14) | +11.9% (N=45) | +58.1% (N=9) | +43.1% (N=21) |
Meal premium (markup), October 2026 stays, same-hotel paired comparison. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
The half-board vs with breakfast step tells the opposite story. Fukuoka’s business-hotel +29.2% approaches Osaka’s +29.6% (N=24) and exceeds Kyoto’s +28.6% (N=16) and Hiroshima’s +27.3% (N=21). Compared with Tokyo at +12.3% (N=38) and Aichi at +16.2% (N=37), Fukuoka’s business hotels clearly sell dinner-inclusive plans at a high step. The Fukuoka business-hotel pattern of keeping the breakfast entry point low and taking the step on dinner is also a tendency shared by western Japanese cities (Osaka, Kyoto, Hiroshima). The structure of Osaka’s dinner step is analyzed in detail in Osaka Meal Premiums: Business Half-Board +29.6% Beats City +26.5%, and Hiroshima’s reversal of the segment gap between breakfast and half-board in Hiroshima Meal Premiums: City Breakfast +16.8%, Half-Board Reverses. The city-hotel half-board step in Fukuoka is +23.6%, thinner than Aichi +32.6% (N=14) and Hokkaido +30.6% (N=26), and close to Tokyo +20.8% (N=26).
To sum up, Fukuoka’s meal premiums form a three-layer structure: a segment split in which “city hotels take it on breakfast and business hotels take it on dinner”; among business hotels, a thicker breakfast step closer to the city center (Hakata and Chuo wards); and a thinning ratio in phases when base rates rise toward autumn. This benchmark is the premise for the practical section that follows.
For Revenue Managers at Fukuoka City and Business Hotels — Implications and Action Plan
1. Benchmark your breakfast step against the market on both “ratio” and “difference.” The breakfast premium in Fukuoka Prefecture is +15.2% / ¥5,717 for city hotels and +7.7% / ¥1,595 for business hotels, and +9.5% / ¥2,407 for business hotels in Hakata Ward. Comparing your own room-only vs with-breakfast gap on these two axes separates “the difference is at market level but the ratio is thin (room-only is high)” from “the difference itself is small.” The former points to room to revisit breakfast pricing; the latter points to how the breakfast product is presented.
2. In months when base rates rise, decide whether to hold the breakfast difference or index it. In the market, the city-hotel difference holds steady in a band of about ¥5,700–6,400, while the ratio thinned from +19.8% in July to +15.2% in October. Holding the difference protects conversion to with-breakfast plans; indexing the ratio captures rate on with-breakfast plans. Which to choose should be judged by looking at which side of the market’s movement your own with-breakfast share is shifting on.
3. Design half-board as “a step up from with breakfast.” Among Fukuoka business hotels, half-board is +29.2% (¥5,210) over with breakfast, and +23.6% (¥10,554) for city hotels; from September to October this step widened in difference while the ratio held flat. Pricing dinner-inclusive plans off room-only tends to make the with-breakfast-to-half-board step look smaller than the market, or conversely jump. Placing with breakfast as the middle stepping stone and checking that the markup from there falls within the market’s step band better matches how guests compare.
4. Assume that the going rate for the breakfast step differs between the city center and the suburbs. Even among business hotels, the going difference ranges widely: ¥2,407 in Hakata Ward, ¥2,075 in Chuo Ward, ¥1,328 in Kokurakita Ward, and ¥883 in Kurume City. If you use a uniform chain-wide setting, city-center properties may be leaving the step on the table while suburban properties may be losing conversion, so there is room to consider area-specific differences.
| Time horizon | Action | Decision trigger (tied to figures in this article) | Objective |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today – this week | Take stock of the differences and ratios across the three tiers — room-only / with breakfast / half-board — for November and December stays | Your breakfast ratio deviates significantly from city +15.2% / business +7.7% (Hakata Ward business +9.5%) | Understand your position relative to the market’s step band |
| Today – this week | Recalculate the half-board step as “the markup over with breakfast” | Your half-board vs with breakfast falls outside the business +29.2% / city +23.6% band | Align the dinner step with the market’s comparison axis |
| Within 2 weeks | Set a rule on whether to hold or index the breakfast difference when base rates are revised | The market breakfast ratio has thinned — city from +19.8% in July to +15.2% in October, business from +10.2% in May to +7.7% in October | Balance with-breakfast conversion and rate during the autumn/winter rate increase |
| Within 2 weeks | If you operate multiple properties, set breakfast differences separately for city-center and suburban properties | A uniform setting is in place despite the going-rate gap from ¥2,407 in Hakata Ward to ¥883 in Kurume City | Capture the step in the city center, protect conversion in the suburbs |
| Toward next month | Review the finalized estimated settled ADR for November stays side by side with changes in your own with-breakfast share | Last year, rates stepped up in autumn from ¥18,258 in October to ¥20,829 in November (city, finalized) | Feed meal-plan mix during the rate-rise period into next year’s design |
| Toward next month | Consider whether to introduce a dinner-only plan (business hotels) | In the market, dinner only vs room-only is +13.7% (N=10) and sold by only a limited number of properties | Create an option for long-stay and late-arrival guests who do not need breakfast |
Action plan based on the aggregated figures in this article. Effects vary with each property’s product mix and guest profile. Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
Summary — Three Benchmarks for Reading Fukuoka’s Meal Steps
First, the segments place their steps differently. Fukuoka’s city hotels take +15.2% (¥5,717) on breakfast, while business hotels hold breakfast to an entry-level +7.7% (¥1,595) and take +29.2% (¥5,210) on half-board. Start by checking which type your property is closer to. Second, the ratio moves with the denominator. Even with a nearly constant breakfast difference, the autumn rise in base rates thinned the city-hotel ratio from +19.8% in July to +15.2% in October. To avoid misreading this as a breakfast price cut, track the ratio alongside the difference. Third, Fukuoka’s position is “thin on breakfast, thick on dinner.” The business-hotel breakfast premium of +7.7% is the thinnest among the eight major prefectures, while the half-board step of +29.2% ranks near the top alongside Osaka, Kyoto, and Hiroshima. Whether there is room to thicken the breakfast step, or whether to follow the market’s pattern of taking it on dinner, will depend on the strength of your breakfast offering and your location (in Hakata Ward, the going rate is +9.5% / ¥2,407).
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. What is a “paired comparison” for meal premiums?
A. It is a method that takes the price difference between two meal types (e.g., room-only and with breakfast) only where the same hotel sells both for the same stay month, and aggregates those differences. Hotels that sell only one of the two are excluded, so the method avoids bias from differences in location and room grade and measures only “the price difference attributable to adding a meal.” N= is the number of hotels for which a pair could be formed.
Q. Why does the ratio fall while the difference stays the same?
A. The ratio is the difference divided by the paired plan’s rate, so if the breakfast difference is held while the base room-only rate rises, the ratio automatically shrinks. At Fukuoka city hotels, the difference held steady in a band of about ¥5,700–6,400 from July to October while the ratio thinned from +19.8% to +15.2%; this is considered to reflect rising base rates rather than a breakfast price cut.
About the Data
■ Data Sources
OTA published plan prices continuously tracked by MetroEngines Research (plans on sale by meal type for May–October 2026 stays), and the estimated settled ADR of city and business hotels in Fukuoka Prefecture based on the same data (September 2025 – October 2026 stays). Data as of October 23, 2026.
■ Calculation Assumptions
Meal premiums are formed only from pairs at properties that sell both meal types in the same hotel and the same stay month; the gap in per-room listed price for two guests (tax included) is shown as a markup ratio over the paired plan (room-only / with breakfast) and as a difference. The difference is not the per-person price of breakfast or dinner. Estimated settled ADR is the median of covered properties in the area, and year-over-year changes are calculated only between finalized values.
■ Limitations and Caveats
Properties that cannot form a pair (those selling only one meal type) are excluded, so the figures do not represent the average meal price across all properties in the prefecture. City hotels by city/ward (N=7) and dinner only (N=10) are small samples and for reference only. October 2026 stays are aggregated for a month still on sale and may change by month-end. Changes in the ratio include not only breakfast and dinner pricing but also seasonal fluctuations in the room-only and with-breakfast rates that serve as the denominator.
• Meal premium: from plan prices on sale through OTAs and other channels, limited to properties where the same hotel sells both of the two compared meal types (room-only / with breakfast / with dinner / half-board) for the same stay month; the markup ratio and difference aggregated from per-pair differences between plans with the same number of guests. Ryokan are excluded. N= is the number of properties for which a pair could be formed. This article deals only with premium ratios and differences and does not show the price levels of individual plans.
• Estimated settled ADR: the settled price level (tax-excluded equivalent) estimated from OTA and other sales data (lowest-plan level × segment-specific factor, an ensemble across multiple channels). Past months are finalized values; current and future months are estimates based on current sales. Checked against published operating results, the median error is 6.6%. Year-over-year comparisons are made only between finalized values.
• Breakdown of N= (October 2026 stays, Fukuoka Prefecture): with breakfast vs room-only — city hotels 30 pairs, business hotels 144 pairs, all segments 183 pairs; half-board vs with breakfast — city 18 pairs, business 52 pairs, all segments 78 pairs; half-board vs room-only — city 18 pairs, business 38 pairs; dinner only vs room-only — business 10 pairs. City/ward figures are shown only for cities/wards and segments with 5 or more pairs. Estimated settled ADR: city hotels N=43 properties and business hotels N=342 properties for September 2026.
• “All segments” is a prefecture-wide aggregate that includes segments other than city and business hotels, and does not equal the combination of the two segments.
• Data as of: October 23, 2026. Sales status and inventory change daily, so the figures in this article are a snapshot at the time of retrieval.
• Source: MetroEngines Research; compiled by HotelBank Editorial Team
Related Articles
- Fukuoka Settled ADR Slows +14.4% to +3.6% — Breakfast Premium Next?
- Osaka Meal Premiums: Business Half-Board +29.6% Beats City +26.5%
- Hiroshima Meal Premiums: City Breakfast +16.8%, Half-Board Reverses
- Tokyo Meal Premiums Sep 2026: Breakfast +11.3%, City Half-Board +29.3%
- Kyoto Breakfast Premium: Business +18.5%, City +18.4%; Autumn 12–13%
- Hokkaido Meal Premiums: Breakfast Gap ¥3,300, Dinner Widens to ¥6,400
- Breakfast Premium 4.4x Gap: Kyoto 22.0% vs Shizuoka 5.0%, 10 Markets
